web analytics

Posts Tagged ‘ Stat Theory ’

A Review of Adjusted Plus/Minus and Stabilization

May 20, 2011
By
A Review of Adjusted Plus/Minus and Stabilization

As I prepare to release my first work based on the Adjusted Plus/Minus and derivative methods, I felt it would be wise to write a plain-English review of the state-of-the-art of Adjusted Plus/Minus and its derivatives, or at least what is known in the public domain. What is Plus/Minus? Plus/Minus, at its core, simply...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NBA Stats | 10 Comments »

Bayesian Golf Ratings and Masters Preview

April 6, 2011
By

That’s right, golf.  I’m taking up where Ken Pomeroy left off.  A year or two ago, he developed a rating system for golfers–basically, he created a huge regression of all players and all specific rounds at tournaments.  Each round was assigned a level of difficulty, and each player was assigned an overall rating.  His...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Golf | 11 Comments »

NCAA Tourney Bayesian Ratings and Odds

March 16, 2011
By
NCAA Tourney Bayesian Ratings and Odds

Okay, ready for the tournament? I’ve put together some adjustments based on the work I .  The theory behind the adjustments may be found on STATS @ MTSU and Dr. Winner @ Florida.  Basically, I’m adjusting for teams that raise their game to a higher level against good foes (or vise-versa).  For instance, Long...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | 3 Comments »

Raising Their Game

March 15, 2011
By
Raising Their Game

When we get to the NCAA tournament, it seems that inevitably, some teams will raise their game, matching up with the “better” teams, suddenly emerging as a top team.  Some teams play well when their opponent is better, and let the foot off the gas when playing East Popcorn St.  Those teams tend to...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

How Does the Committee Seed? Introducing ExpSd

March 14, 2011
By

The Bracket was revealed yesterday.  Quick thoughts and long ramblings below: I have two rankings systems: my Bayesian predictive power ratings, which tell how good the teams are, and my DSMRPI ratings, which tell how much they have accomplished.  I would put teams in and seed them based on DSMRPI, which looks purely at...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | 2 Comments »

NCAA Bayesian Ratings, With Projection Prior

March 12, 2011
By

In my , I took as the Bayesian prior the overall distribution of NCAA teams.  Now, we know more than that–we can create a pretty good projection of how good a team will be based on how good the team has been the previous few years.  So let’s do it! I compiled the Pomeroy...
Read more »

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

NCAA Bayesian Analysis & DSMRPI

March 7, 2011
By
NCAA Bayesian Analysis & DSMRPI

 I posted my NCAA Bayesian Ratings and methodology.  Today I thought I’d update the numbers quickly and add a new twist. What is the objective in basketball? To win the game! When doing a predictive rating system (like this Bayesian method) or even trying to tell how good teams are over this season (KenPom’s...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

Bayesian Efficiency Ratings: NCAA Basketball

February 18, 2011
By

A few days ago, I put up a massive post on . Nathan Walker (the Basketball Distribution) commented that I should apply the system to NCAA basketball, and so I have. Thanks to Ken Pomeroy’s incredible NCAA basketball database, the data was quite easy to obtain. Since he already compiles a fully adjusted efficiency...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NBA Adjusted Efficiencies, NBA Rankings, NCAA Basketball | 1 Comment »

On Bayesian Predictive Efficiency Rankings

February 15, 2011
By
Bayesian Update

It is fairly easy to construct a retrospective efficiency rating. Take the efficiencies for each game, correct for location and rest, and then solve using an OLS regression for each team’s true efficiency rating. Nice and neat. However, how should a predictive rating work? The best approach would be to adjust for what players...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Google Motion Charts, NBA Adjusted Efficiencies, NBA Rankings, NBA Stats | 12 Comments »

ASPM Box Score: Thunder-Heat

January 31, 2011
By
ASPM Box Score: Thunder-Heat

Yesterday’s Thunder-Heat game was a fun game to watch and a great game to investigate. Oklahoma City started out with a significant advantage in this game: OKC was at home (worth 3.24 pts/100 poss) and was playing on 1 day of rest (+1.94), while Miami was playing their 3rd game in 4 days, and...
Read more »

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Advanced SPM, ASPM Box Score, NBA Stats | 6 Comments »

DSMok1 on Twitter

To-Do List

  1. Google Motion Charts for each position, including salary and contract value
  2. Discussion of salary/contract value
  3. Aging curves for individual components (ORB%, Blk%, etc.)
  4. Comparison of residual exponents for rankings
  5. Comparison of various "value metrics" ability to "explain" wins
  6. Publication of spreadsheets used
  7. Work on using Bayesian priors in Adjusted +/-
  8. Work on K-Means clustering for player categorization
  9. Learn ridge regression
  10. Temporally locally-weighted rankings
  11. WOWY as validation of replacement level
  12. Revise ASPM with latest RAPM data
  13. Conversion of ASPM to" wins"
  14. Recursive WOWY Team Ratings
  15. Lineup Bayesian APM
  16. Lineup RAPM