web analytics

Posts Tagged ‘ NCAA Basketball ’

Final 4 Update

April 2, 2011
By

VCU and Butler have continued their run.  Before the tournament, I had them highly because they elevated their games in the regular season when playing good opponents.  They have both continued that and increased that trend. One confounding issue now with adding the “Raising their Game” (“Ag25″ in the table below) bonus is that...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

On Crowds and Contrarian Picks

March 17, 2011
By
On Crowds and Contrarian Picks

If you are choosing NCAA tournament picks in a LARGE group (like ESPN), then, if possible, you need to account for what the masses have chosen in making your own selections.  Fortunately, ESPN publicly shows what everyone has picked–and that lets us account for them. As the number of people approaches infinity, the formula...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

NCAA Tourney Bayesian Ratings and Odds

March 16, 2011
By
NCAA Tourney Bayesian Ratings and Odds

Okay, ready for the tournament? I’ve put together some adjustments based on the work I .  The theory behind the adjustments may be found on STATS @ MTSU and Dr. Winner @ Florida.  Basically, I’m adjusting for teams that raise their game to a higher level against good foes (or vise-versa).  For instance, Long...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | 3 Comments »

Raising Their Game

March 15, 2011
By
Raising Their Game

When we get to the NCAA tournament, it seems that inevitably, some teams will raise their game, matching up with the “better” teams, suddenly emerging as a top team.  Some teams play well when their opponent is better, and let the foot off the gas when playing East Popcorn St.  Those teams tend to...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

How Does the Committee Seed? Introducing ExpSd

March 14, 2011
By

The Bracket was revealed yesterday.  Quick thoughts and long ramblings below: I have two rankings systems: my Bayesian predictive power ratings, which tell how good the teams are, and my DSMRPI ratings, which tell how much they have accomplished.  I would put teams in and seed them based on DSMRPI, which looks purely at...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | 2 Comments »

NCAA Bayesian Ratings, With Projection Prior

March 12, 2011
By

In my , I took as the Bayesian prior the overall distribution of NCAA teams.  Now, we know more than that–we can create a pretty good projection of how good a team will be based on how good the team has been the previous few years.  So let’s do it! I compiled the Pomeroy...
Read more »

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

NCAA Bayesian Analysis & DSMRPI

March 7, 2011
By
NCAA Bayesian Analysis & DSMRPI

 I posted my NCAA Bayesian Ratings and methodology.  Today I thought I’d update the numbers quickly and add a new twist. What is the objective in basketball? To win the game! When doing a predictive rating system (like this Bayesian method) or even trying to tell how good teams are over this season (KenPom’s...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NCAA Basketball | No Comments »

Bayesian Efficiency Ratings: NCAA Basketball

February 18, 2011
By

A few days ago, I put up a massive post on . Nathan Walker (the Basketball Distribution) commented that I should apply the system to NCAA basketball, and so I have. Thanks to Ken Pomeroy’s incredible NCAA basketball database, the data was quite easy to obtain. Since he already compiles a fully adjusted efficiency...
Read more »

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in NBA Adjusted Efficiencies, NBA Rankings, NCAA Basketball | 1 Comment »

DSMok1 on Twitter

To-Do List

  1. Salary and contract value discussions and charts
  2. Multi-year APM/RAPM with aging incorporated
  3. Revise ASPM based on multi-year RAPM with aging
  4. ASPM within-year stability/cross validation
  5. Historical ASPM Tableau visualizations
  6. Create Excel VBA recursive web scraping tutorial
  7. Comparison of residual exponents for rankings
  8. Comparison of various "value metrics" ability to "explain" wins
  9. Publication of spreadsheets used
  10. Work on using Bayesian priors in Adjusted +/-
  11. Work on K-Means clustering for player categorization
  12. Learn ridge regression
  13. Temporally locally-weighted rankings
  14. WOWY as validation of replacement level
  15. Revise ASPM with latest RAPM data
  16. Conversion of ASPM to" wins"
  17. Lineup Bayesian APM
  18. Lineup RAPM
  19. Learn SQL