web analytics

NBA Adjusted Efficiency Rankings 2-6-2011

February 7, 2011
By

It’s been a while since I last put together the fully adjusted NBA efficiency rankings. Here are the latest ratings (prev is 1-13-2011, the last time I updated):

RankChgTeamOff EffDef EffEff. MarginChangePrevSoSPace
1MIA3.97-4.198.16-0.208.36-0.5490.1
2BOS0.62-6.657.28-0.717.99-0.5289.9
3SAS3.28-3.446.71-0.527.23-0.7991.6
4LAL6.24-0.356.58-0.437.01-0.7290.7
51CHI-2.13-7.755.610.674.95-0.7990.5
6-1ORL2.18-3.305.480.375.11-0.2291.5
7DAL0.92-2.483.41-0.654.06-0.0990.1
83NOH-1.57-4.903.341.162.170.2488.3
9-1DEN5.282.302.98-0.233.21-0.3295.0
103OKC4.042.171.870.131.74-0.3392.1
11-2ATL0.91-0.961.87-0.972.84-0.4389.5
123MEM-1.20-2.861.660.760.900.1691.7
13-1NYK3.021.971.05-0.811.860.4595.8
142HOU2.972.040.930.580.350.8393.2
152PHI-0.54-1.140.600.470.130.3090.4
16-2POR0.09-0.450.54-0.791.340.4487.4
17-7UTA2.392.260.13-2.222.350.0390.2
181IND-2.29-1.61-0.680.04-0.72-0.2894.0
191PHO3.134.44-1.311.13-2.44-0.0194.4
20-2MIL-6.40-5.01-1.40-0.74-0.650.6089.2
21LAC-0.462.04-2.500.18-2.670.2091.1
22GSW2.074.69-2.620.33-2.950.2894.6
231CHA-3.83-0.04-3.800.83-4.63-0.1088.9
242DET-0.893.26-4.151.06-5.210.1587.9
25-2TOR-0.375.19-5.56-1.39-4.170.4493.0
263SAC-5.340.56-5.902.56-8.46-0.7093.1
27-2MIN-1.914.07-5.98-0.82-5.160.1296.7
28WAS-4.182.51-6.690.17-6.870.2192.5
29-2NJN-3.822.88-6.700.07-6.770.1088.5
30CLE-6.194.73-10.92-0.03-10.891.2893.1

If you will recall, I last time was puzzling over what exponent to use when minimizing |residuals|^n. I tried out a number of different exponents in out-of-sample tests (for example, 2/3 of games in sample, compared to 1/3 of games out of sample) and discovered a few things. First, there is a ton of random scatter as to which exponent produced the closest results in the out-of-sample test (exponents as small as 1.3 and as large as 2.5 were best, depending on how the samples were split). Secondly, the only reason to use an exponent other than 2 would be if we are certain team performances ARE skewed distributions. Third… I think team performances probably approximate a random sample from a normal distribution–thus, I am switching to minimizing squared error.

How about the same rankings as a lovely image?

Team Rankings 2-6-11

Adjusted NBA Team Efficiencies, through 2-6-11


Interesting notes:

  • Utah is playing badly
  • Chicago is dangerous, and they aren’t even healthy yet
  • Did anyone think OKC would have the 3rd best offense?
  • The Hornets have been seriously up-and-down
  • Has anyone mentioned that Cleveland is bad?

As another improvement, I created a macro that went through and calculated the team ratings, offensive ratings, defensive ratings, and pace numbers after each day of the season. Thus, the latest Google Motion Chart now has all 4 data points for each day of the season since December 1st (the ratings are really unstable early in the season).

Watch how Chicago, Utah, and Cleveland have changed since that date!

The full data for this visualization is available as a Google Spreadsheet.

Tags: , , ,

One Response to NBA Adjusted Efficiency Rankings 2-6-2011

  1. Crow on February 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm

    The change column is helpful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current day month ye@r *

DSMok1 on Twitter

To-Do List

  1. Salary and contract value discussions and charts
  2. Multi-year APM/RAPM with aging incorporated
  3. Revise ASPM based on multi-year RAPM with aging
  4. ASPM within-year stability/cross validation
  5. Historical ASPM Tableau visualizations
  6. Create Excel VBA recursive web scraping tutorial
  7. Comparison of residual exponents for rankings
  8. Comparison of various "value metrics" ability to "explain" wins
  9. Publication of spreadsheets used
  10. Work on using Bayesian priors in Adjusted +/-
  11. Work on K-Means clustering for player categorization
  12. Learn ridge regression
  13. Temporally locally-weighted rankings
  14. WOWY as validation of replacement level
  15. Revise ASPM with latest RAPM data
  16. Conversion of ASPM to" wins"
  17. Lineup Bayesian APM
  18. Lineup RAPM
  19. Learn SQL