Below is a snapshot of the Web page as it appeared on 4/2/2011 (the last time our crawler visited it). This is the version of the page that was used for ranking your search results. The page may have changed since we last cached it. To see what might have changed (without the highlights), go to the current page.
Bing is not responsible for the content of this page.
APBRmetrics :: View topic - ezPM
APBRmetrics Forum Index APBRmetrics
The statistical revolution will not be televised.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ezPM
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
EvanZ



Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 290

PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:33 pm    Post subject: ezPM Reply with quote

I've got PBP data in my linear weights model now. Thought some of you would be interested. I'd go into depth here, but I think most of it is old hat to you guys. If you have any questions/comments/suggestions, feel free to leave them here or at my blog.

http://thecity2.com/2010/12/28/ezpm-1-0-now-with-play-by-play-data/
_________________
http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike G



Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 3601
Location: Hendersonville, NC

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many fans will have a problem with this language:
Quote:
Say Curry was +5, Ellis was +6, Lee was +2, Biedrins was +1 and Dorell Wright was -4. In this example, the team +/- is +10, but Dorell Wright was actually a negative contributer.

Unless this covered relatively few minutes, can you really say Wright made negative overall contributions?

Put more broadly, does it make real-world sense to say the entirety of NBA rosters make zero net contributions?

In the NBA Finals, with the 2 best teams in the world going at it, are there as many negative as positive acts?

If the Warriors should bench all their 'negative contributors', would they win more games? Would they have 5 players?

Do you really win 41 games with zero net contribution toward winning those many games?
_________________
`
36% of all statistics are wrong
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DSMok1



Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 611
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike G, that's the definition of plus/minus.

Your comments are why replacement level is required to value players.
_________________
GodismyJudgeOK.com/DStats
Twitter.com/DSMok1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
bbstats



Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For clarification: to be .500 is to win by 0, on average.
_________________
http://thebasketballdistribution.blogspot.com

http://twitter.com/bbstats
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
EvanZ



Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 290

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike G wrote:


If the Warriors should bench all their 'negative contributors', would they win more games? Would they have 5 players?



Uh, I really think if they benched Vlad Rad, they would have won at least 2 more games. Laughing
_________________
http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DSMok1



Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 611
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvanZ wrote:
Mike G wrote:


If the Warriors should bench all their 'negative contributors', would they win more games? Would they have 5 players?



Uh, I really think if they benched Vlad Rad, they would have won at least 2 more games. Laughing


ASPM has Vlad Rad as close to league-average. What's the big difference between your numbers and mine on him? I have him as a -1.2 offensive player (his numbers aren't that bad) and a +1.2 defender (the best on Golden State). The defense is based on his high steal and block numbers. What do you see differently?
_________________
GodismyJudgeOK.com/DStats
Twitter.com/DSMok1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
EvanZ



Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 290

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My model has him at -4.81 (-1.5/-3.3). My eyes tend to agree. He's a nightmare on offense and defense most of the time. Can't stay in front of anyone. He hits a three every once in a while, and is a tall white European guy (who had a few good playoff games with LAL). Somehow, Keith Smart trusts him.

BTW, not just my opinion. If you ever go over to GSOM, he is universally despised.

EDIT: I'm referring to 2009-10 stats. I haven't crunched this season yet.
_________________
http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BobboFitos



Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 199
Location: Cambridge, MA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DSMok1 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
Mike G wrote:


If the Warriors should bench all their 'negative contributors', would they win more games? Would they have 5 players?



Uh, I really think if they benched Vlad Rad, they would have won at least 2 more games. Laughing


ASPM has Vlad Rad as close to league-average. What's the big difference between your numbers and mine on him? I have him as a -1.2 offensive player (his numbers aren't that bad) and a +1.2 defender (the best on Golden State). The defense is based on his high steal and block numbers. What do you see differently?


Counterpart data suggests Vlad Rad is a +3.3 per 100 defender. (Meaning, he's 3.3 points below average) From the eye test as well/stereotype about older tall Euros, I'm prone to believe that. Take it for whatever it's worth though, counterpart isn't reliable etc etc.
_________________
-Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
DSMok1



Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 611
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He's unusual in that he has high steal rates and high block rates.
_________________
GodismyJudgeOK.com/DStats
Twitter.com/DSMok1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BobboFitos



Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 199
Location: Cambridge, MA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DSMok1 wrote:
He's unusual in that he has high steal rates and high block rates.


He's also way outperforming his career norms on blocks and steals this year. Per 36, he's 2.0 spg/1.2 bpg. Career wise, 1.2 and .5, respectively.
_________________
-Rob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
EvanZ



Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 290

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DSMok1 wrote:
He's unusual in that he has high steal rates and high block rates.


Yeah, that's true. Interestingly, though, ezPM places quite a bit of weight on blocks (0.7). He would be much worse off without it I guess. Like I said before, I need to do this season. Maybe my eyes are deceiving me.
_________________
http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvanZ



Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 290

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've done the 2010-11 numbers through Wednesday:

Code:

Rank   ORank   DRank   LAST    FIRST    TEAM   POS   EZPM100   OFF100   DEF100   POSS
1   1   3   Paul    Chris   NOH   1   11.02   8.93   2.10   1833
2   10   7   Wade    Dwyane   MIA   2   6.73   5.48   1.24   2125
3   18   5   James    LeBron   MIA   3   6.67   5.20   1.47   2304
4   2   114   Nash    Steve   PHX   1   6.45   8.08   -1.63   1788
5   3   84   Williams    Deron   UTA   1   6.13   7.22   -1.09   2150
6   6   26   Ginobili    Manu   SAS   2   5.97   5.92   0.05   1871
7   97   1   Garnett    Kevin   BOS   4   5.29   2.16   3.13   1698
8   16   25   Rose    Derrick   CHI   1   5.28   5.24   0.05   1938
9   9   58   Parker    Tony   SAS   1   4.86   5.51   -0.65   1859
10   89   2   Howard    Dwight   ORL   5   4.86   2.36   2.50   1834
11   42   13   Rondo    Rajon   BOS   1   4.70   3.89   0.80   1443
12   29   31   Carter    Vince   ORL   2   4.38   4.47   -0.09   1114
13   11   86   Horford    Al   ATL   5   4.37   5.47   -1.11   1918
14   12   91   Gasol    Pau   LAL   5   4.23   5.44   -1.21   2250
15   15   82   Nowitzki    Dirk   DAL   4   4.18   5.26   -1.09   1797
16   33   32   Miller    Andre   POR   1   4.16   4.31   -0.14   1695
17   24   56   Westbrook    Russell   OKC   1   4.07   4.69   -0.62   2076
18   34   36   Pierce    Paul   BOS   3   4.02   4.26   -0.23   1946
19   44   24   Young    Thaddeus   PHI   3   3.98   3.84   0.14   1616
20   5   140   Love    Kevin   MIN   4   3.92   5.97   -2.05   2139
21   20   76   Bryant    Kobe   LAL   2   3.91   4.93   -1.02   1850
22   7   133   Nelson    Jameer   ORL   1   3.86   5.84   -1.99   1407
23   22   80   Felton    Raymond   NYK   1   3.82   4.88   -1.06   2266
24   35   50   Chandler    Tyson   DAL   5   3.74   4.23   -0.48   1287
25   4   165   Martin    Kevin   HOU   2   3.61   6.17   -2.57   1823
26   83   9   Kidd    Jason   DAL   1   3.56   2.46   1.11   1645
27   88   8   Duncan    Tim   SAS   5   3.56   2.36   1.20   1602
28   48   38   Anthony    Carmelo   DEN   3   3.36   3.62   -0.26   1556
29   19   126   Harris    Devin   NJN   1   3.34   5.15   -1.82   1548
30   13   147   Hilario    Nene   DEN   5   3.27   5.44   -2.17   1561
31   51   35   Lowry    Kyle   HOU   1   3.17   3.39   -0.23   1657
32   41   61   Noah    Joakim   CHI   5   3.17   3.90   -0.74   1545
33   57   29   Brown    Shannon   LAL   2   3.15   3.18   -0.03   1277
34   54   33   Hill    George   SAS   1   3.13   3.28   -0.15   1540
35   131   4   Brewer    Ronnie   CHI   2   3.10   1.34   1.76   1278
36   72   23   Gay    Rudy   MEM   3   3.07   2.77   0.30   2249
37   30   98   Odom    Lamar   LAL   4   3.04   4.44   -1.39   2054
38   14   157   Gordon    Eric   LAC   2   2.98   5.39   -2.41   1987
39   50   57   Durant    Kevin   OKC   3   2.97   3.60   -0.63   2083
40   26   112   Calderon    Jose   TOR   1   2.96   4.56   -1.60   1330
41   81   18   Thomas    Tyrus   CHA   4   2.94   2.47   0.47   1010
42   31   101   Randolph    Zach   MEM   4   2.87   4.35   -1.48   1817
43   40   83   Brand    Elton   PHI   5   2.85   3.93   -1.09   1717
44   28   119   Griffin    Blake   LAC   4   2.82   4.55   -1.72   2037
45   59   47   Allen    Ray   BOS   2   2.77   3.16   -0.39   1969
46   65   40   Barnes    Matt   LAL   3   2.74   3.04   -0.30   1438
47   99   16   Iguodala    Andre   PHI   2   2.72   2.06   0.65   1533
48   68   46   Bosh    Chris   MIA   4   2.59   2.96   -0.37   2181
49   27   137   Lawson    Ty   DEN   1   2.55   4.55   -2.00   1740
50   108   14   McGrady    Tracy   DET   3   2.52   1.84   0.69   1058


Vince Carter! Shocked
_________________
http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deepak



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 665

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvanZ wrote:
I've done the 2010-11 numbers through Wednesday:

Vince Carter! Shocked


Thanks. Its interesting to me that everyone in the top 50 is a positive offensive contributor, while most are negative defensive contributors. Will the Def100 for the entire league sum up to 0?


Here it is, with easier to read formatting:

Code:

Rank   ORank   DRank   Name                TEAM     POS  EZPM100   OFF100   DEF100   POSS
1      1       3       Chris Paul          NOH      1    11.02     8.93     2.1      1833
2      10      7       Dwyane Wade         MIA      2    6.73      5.48     1.24     2125
3      18      5       LeBron James        MIA      3    6.67      5.2      1.47     2304
4      2       114     Steve Nash          PHX      1    6.45      8.08    -1.63     1788
5      3       84      Deron Williams      UTA      1    6.13      7.22    -1.09     2150
6      6       26      Manu Ginobili       SAS      2    5.97      5.92     0.05     1871
7      97      1       Kevin Garnett       BOS      4    5.29      2.16     3.13     1698
8      16      25      Derrick Rose        CHI      1    5.28      5.24     0.05     1938
9      9       58      Tony Parker         SAS      1    4.86      5.51    -0.65     1859
10     89      2       Dwight Howard       ORL      5    4.86      2.36     2.5      1834
11     42      13      Rajon Rondo         BOS      1    4.7       3.89     0.8      1443
12     29      31      Vince Carter        ORL      2    4.38      4.47    -0.09     1114
13     11      86      Al Horford          ATL      5    4.37      5.47    -1.11     1918
14     12      91      Pau Gasol           LAL      5    4.23      5.44    -1.21     2250
15     15      82      Dirk Nowitzki       DAL      4    4.18      5.26    -1.09     1797
16     33      32      Andre Miller        POR      1    4.16      4.31    -0.14     1695
17     24      56      Russell Westbrook   OKC      1    4.07      4.69    -0.62     2076
18     34      36      Paul Pierce         BOS      3    4.02      4.26    -0.23     1946
19     44      24      Thaddeus Young      PHI      3    3.98      3.84     0.14     1616
20     5       140     Kevin Love          MIN      4    3.92      5.97    -2.05     2139
21     20      76      Kobe Bryant         LAL      2    3.91      4.93    -1.02     1850
22     7       133     Jameer Nelson       ORL      1    3.86      5.84    -1.99     1407
23     22      80      Raymond Felton      NYK      1    3.82      4.88    -1.06     2266
24     35      50      Tyson Chandler      DAL      5    3.74      4.23    -0.48     1287
25     4       165     Kevin Martin        HOU      2    3.61      6.17    -2.57     1823
26     83      9       Jason Kidd          DAL      1    3.56      2.46     1.11     1645
27     88      8       Tim Duncan          SAS      5    3.56      2.36     1.2      1602
28     48      38      Carmelo Anthony     DEN      3    3.36      3.62    -0.26     1556
29     19      126     Devin Harris        NJN      1    3.34      5.15    -1.82     1548
30     13      147     Nene Hilario        DEN      5    3.27      5.44    -2.17     1561
31     51      35      Kyle Lowry          HOU      1    3.17      3.39    -0.23     1657
32     41      61      Joakim Noah         CHI      5    3.17      3.9     -0.74     1545
33     57      29      Shannon Brown       LAL      2    3.15      3.18    -0.03     1277
34     54      33      George Hill         SAS      1    3.13      3.28    -0.15     1540
35     131     4       Ronnie Brewer       CHI      2    3.1       1.34     1.76     1278
36     72      23      Rudy Gay            MEM      3    3.07      2.77     0.3      2249
37     30      98      Lamar Odom          LAL      4    3.04      4.44    -1.39     2054
38     14      157     Eric Gordon         LAC      2    2.98      5.39    -2.41     1987
39     50      57      Kevin Durant        OKC      3    2.97      3.6     -0.63     2083
40     26      112     Jose Calderon       TOR      1    2.96      4.56    -1.6      1330
41     81      18      Tyrus Thomas        CHA      4    2.94      2.47     0.47     1010
42     31      101     Zach Randolph       MEM      4    2.87      4.35    -1.48     1817
43     40      83      Elton Brand         PHI      5    2.85      3.93    -1.09     1717
44     28      119     Blake Griffin       LAC      4    2.82      4.55    -1.72     2037
45     59      47      Ray Allen           BOS      2    2.77      3.16    -0.39     1969
46     65      40      Matt Barnes         LAL      3    2.74      3.04    -0.3      1438
47     99      16      Andre Iguodala      PHI      2    2.72      2.06     0.65     1533
48     68      46      Chris Bosh          MIA      4    2.59      2.96    -0.37     2181
49     27      137     Ty Lawson           DEN      1    2.55      4.55    -2        1740
50     108     14      Tracy McGrady       DET      3    2.52      1.84     0.69     1058
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvanZ



Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 290

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

deepak wrote:


Thanks. Its interesting to me that everyone in the top 50 is a positive offensive contributor, while most are negative defensive contributors. Will the Def100 for the entire league sum up to 0?




Defense + offense should theoretically sum to zero in my model. Here are the actual totals for the entire league:

#Possessions (all players summed): 408,523
Offensive ezPM points: +7,033
Defensive ezPM points: -6,691
Total (Off+Def)/#Possessions: uh, really close to zero obviously Wink

BTW, how do you get the formatting so nice? Not by hand, I assume.
_________________
http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deepak



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 665

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvanZ wrote:

BTW, how do you get the formatting so nice? Not by hand, I assume.


I copied it into Excel (text to columns), merged the first and last name columns. Then copied it into my text editor (vim), replaced tabs with spaces, and adjusted the spacing between the columns (easy to do in vim).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group