Below is a snapshot of the Web page as it appeared on 4/2/2011 (the last time our crawler visited it). This is the version of the page that was used for ranking your search results. The page may have changed since we last cached it. To see what might have changed (without the highlights), go to the current page.
Bing is not responsible for the content of this page.
APBRmetrics :: View topic - Value of an Expiring Contract
APBRmetrics Forum Index APBRmetrics
The statistical revolution will not be televised.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Value of an Expiring Contract

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jburchen



Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Posts: 9
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:43 pm    Post subject: Value of an Expiring Contract Reply with quote

Has anyone thought about ways to measure the value of an expiring contract? My thoughts were something along the lines of:

(luxury tax $s saved)+(some measure of the value of the free agent space created)-(salary remaining)...

That isn't very refined yet, but I was thinking that the value of the space created would be in tiers (so if you carve out enough for LeBron, that means way more than twice carving out half the space for a mid-level player) reflecting the average surplus value of a player at that contract level. Having a hard time getting any farther than that though.

Thanks.
________
BMW S85 history


Last edited by jburchen on Mon Feb 07, 2011 9:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devin3807



Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Value of an Expiring Contract Reply with quote

jburchen wrote:
Has anyone thought about ways to measure the value of an expiring contract? My thoughts were something along the lines of:

(luxury tax $s saved)+(some measure of the value of the free agent space created)-(salary remaining)...

That isn't very refined yet, but I was thinking that the value of the space created would be in tiers (so if you carve out enough for LeBron, that means way more than twice carving out half the space for a mid-level player) reflecting the average surplus value of a player at that contract level. Having a hard time getting any farther than that though.

Thanks.


What about the value of not just letting it expire, but rather dealing it (I'm thinking recent Ilgauskas) for a very good player, and then even getting said "expiring" back, or even if you didn't get it back?

Arguably Ilaguaskas' expiring had considerably more value being used in such a manner as opposed to any value in simply expiring.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Manchvegasbob



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does anybody know what deal Ilgauskas took in the buy-out? Did he take 90 cents on the dollar of the money remaining on his contract?

The incentives are hard to figure here, and it seems like some collusion is going on with these trade-away and re-sign said "contract buy-out" player.

In general, if there are details on the financials of these buy-outs from the team doing the buy-out and the player bought out's perspective, it would be appreciated.

Larry Coon's stuff on this isn't clear, but I guess the player can agree to take less if the team will release him to play on another squad - is that basically it? If that is the case, the team saves a few $$$ but undoubtedly is weaker because they lost said player - unless they are in a development stage anyway and it doesn't matter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ARucker



Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manchvegasbob wrote:
Does anybody know what deal Ilgauskas took in the buy-out? Did he take 90 cents on the dollar of the money remaining on his contract?

The incentives are hard to figure here, and it seems like some collusion is going on with these trade-away and re-sign said "contract buy-out" player.

In general, if there are details on the financials of these buy-outs from the team doing the buy-out and the player bought out's perspective, it would be appreciated.

Larry Coon's stuff on this isn't clear, but I guess the player can agree to take less if the team will release him to play on another squad - is that basically it? If that is the case, the team saves a few $$$ but undoubtedly is weaker because they lost said player - unless they are in a development stage anyway and it doesn't matter.


ESPN report was that he took a 1.5M hit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike G



Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 3601
Location: Hendersonville, NC

PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If so, he's only getting 9.3 mill.
That would be 92% of what he made last year.
And he's only half as good as last year.
_________________
`
36% of all statistics are wrong
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Crow



Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Posts: 815

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

(Luxury tax $ saved) and (some measure of the value of the free agent space created) are both possible values of an expiring contract but often teams will have to choose how much to have of each or to have one and not the other. And you have to decide what else to assume they are going to do with the roster and budget.

Value of the free agent space created could be measured the way you describe, if you assume unit returns but I'd prefer to look carefully at the situation since I think the win impact depends on how much else you have and how it fits with regard to position playing time, shots and other Factor redundancy / returns.

The dollar value of the performance or wins that could be purchased for an amount will also vary if it is all spent on one guy or several and who teams can really get will vary.

I think you can list out the things to consider but I think each calculation will be a bit different.

Ultimately teams have different quality curves / competitive windows / plans for future years and value hierarchies about court vs financial performance (that might shift).

If you did work out decently estimated values of an expiring contract of a certain size or all sizes for all teams then you could get a sense of who could / should be buyers and sellers, an overall sense of the level of supply and demand and the levels of motivation. Ultimately you have to guess at 30 team plans / value systems to know what an expiring contract- or anything else- is worth to them.


Last edited by Crow on Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LucaMarzorati



Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:01 pm    Post subject: Expiring Contract Value Idea Reply with quote

I was also pondering the value of an expiring contract, as they are becoming a more and more integral, yet abstract, part of the game. If you think about it, it is rare in the previously cut-and-dry sports world to evaluate the "value of nothing." I'm going to take a stab at the value as well, using previous posts as a backbone. Note that this is a very rough outline.

The first part would be to measure the value of the salary cap vacancy created. A basic way would be to convert the cap space saved into wins, and tack that on to the value of a player. For instance, if one was to postulate that $3m translated to a win, then each $3m the hypothetical player saves in salary cap space could be converted to one win. However, this basic logic omits two tenets of salary cap wisdom.

First off, uncertainty has to be weighted into the equation. A player's value in 2010-11 is a much easier guess then their value 2015-16. Therefore, the value of the vacant cap space has to be reduced by a certain factor throughout the contract. The true of value of this factor is unknown, but my best guess is that it is around 7%, meaning that, for instance, the fifth year of the contract would have a certainty of 0.93^(5-1) = 75%. This section is the most abstract of weighing the value of an expiring contract.

I like what jburchen tried to incorporate, regarding the value of a superstar like LeBron James, as compared to a league-average player. I think the rationale for this is that the NBA pay scale is exponential, not linear - if Player A produces twice as many wins as Player B, Player A will probably have a salary more than three times as large as Player B. Therefore, the space that the expiring contract leaves has to be converted into spending power. Let's stick with the idea that each win costs $3m. Using the equation [Spending Wins=Millions to Spend/3 + Millions to Spend ^ 1.1] we can try and interpret the value of more cap space. Using these fictitious numbers, having $10m to spend nets about 6 wins, while having $20m to spend nets 13 wins, while having $30m to spend nets 27 wins.

The numbers used in are not exact and are used to test a model, and it is hard to estimate how many wins a player contributes to his team. However, I'm just throwing out a methodology that could certainly be improved upon. Also, like jburchen, I would include the money saved from the lack of luxury taxation. In addition, I think Crow's point about adjusting for "team plans" is valid, but I wonder if perhaps expiring contract value should be team-independent.[/list]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jburchen



Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Posts: 9
Location: Vermont

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:51 am    Post subject: Re: Value of an Expiring Contract Reply with quote

I really like the idea that the value increases by some non-linear power. It makes a lot of sense and better explains the reality of these free agent decisions.

As of right now, I have made a little progress. Where my thoughts were originally that:

jburchen wrote:


(luxury tax $s saved)+(some measure of the value of the free agent space created)-(salary remaining)...



Now, I think we can refine that to:

E(V) = (Luxury Tax $ Saved) + E(V of free agent)

Where, E(V of free agent) = f(Team Cap Space)

I was thinking about going out to Free Agent Data from the past 20 years and using the model that I am developing to create a $ value of a player to see how much surplus ($ value of player - salary) is created at each tranche of team cap space available. In this way, we don't need to evaluate the team's actual plan, simply theorize that they are going to maximize this surplus (we believe them to be profit maximizing) through the use of their cap space.

I hadn't really thought about future cap space beyond the first year. LucaMarzorati very correctly pointed out that it needs to be discounted due to risk (unclear what the talent crop will look like years out). 7% seems reasonable to me, but I would like to think about how this could be estimated or what other factors could make sense before I move forward.
________
Ford Transit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group