APBRmetrics Forum Index APBRmetrics
The statistical revolution will not be televised.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Pace Factor, Expected Wins, and the PER

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
knicksfan



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 12:47 pm    Post subject: Pace Factor, Expected Wins, and the PER Reply with quote

Hello Everyone,

I really enjoy this board and its pursuit of statistical diversion from the basketball norms. I have three questions regarding the above topics.

Regarding the Pace factor and expected wins, I know the formulas, but I'm not sure of the results. Here are a couple of examples using data from a couple of leagues that I'm in.

1) Detroit Pistons (71-72) 27-47

Pace Factor = (Team Poss + Opp Poss X 48) / Team Minutes X 2

Pace Factor = ((8552+8537) X 48) /17794 X 2

Pace Factor = 820272 / 35588

Pace Factor = 23.4

**23.4 points IS NOT my team's pace for that particular season. What am I doing wrong?

2) Expected Wins = 82 X (pts^16.5) / (pts^16.5 + pts All^16.5)

TABA 06-07:

Altoona = 82 X (10228^16.5) / (10228^16.5 + 7858^16.5)
Altoona = 82 X (1.45^16.5) / (1.45 X 10^66 + 1.87 X 10^64)
Altoona = 82 X (145 / 145 + 18.7)
Altoona = 82 X (145/163.7)
Altoona = 82 X .885
Altoona = 72.57
Altoona = 73 Wins

Please let me know if this is correct, or, where did I go wrong?

3) PER-- Does anyone have an entry formula for Hollinger's PER in Excel format? I thought that I'd ask before I struggle through the task of constructing one.

Thanks,

Miguel
_________________
LOOK OUT BELOW!!! WITH NO REGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!

Kevin Harlan-TNT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
davis21wylie2121



Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 530
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. "Team Minutes" needs to be divided by 5 to account for the 5 players on the court at any given time.

2. Expected winning % is just found by: (points scored^16.5)/((points scored^16.5)+(points allowed^16.5)). So if I'm calculating it for the 2008 Celtics, who scored 8245 pts and allowed 7404, I would plug in: (8245^16.5)/((8245^16.5)+(7404^16.5)) = .855. Multiply .855 by 82, and you get 70 expected wins. 14 is a better exponent than 16.5, though.

3. I just posted a PER excel worksheet to the APBRmetrics files Yahoo group. It's from 2006 (the last year I actually bothered to calculate PER), but you can apply it to any season you want.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
knicksfan



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the response and helpful information, Davis.

I've already downloaded the Excel file, as I perused through some old threads and found out about it's location. Thanks so much though.

When I divide team minutes by five, where do I do so? Or does that even matter?

I appreciate the example for expected wins.

Miguel
_________________
LOOK OUT BELOW!!! WITH NO REGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!

Kevin Harlan-TNT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
94by50



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 458
Location: Phoenix

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

knicksfan wrote:
When I divide team minutes by five, where do I do so? Or does that even matter?

Like this:

Pace Factor = (Team Poss + Opp Poss X 48) / (Team Minutes / 5) X 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dudeimstoked



Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davis21wylie2121 wrote:
1. "Team Minutes" needs to be divided by 5 to account for the 5 players on the court at any given time.

2. Expected winning % is just found by: (points scored^16.5)/((points scored^16.5)+(points allowed^16.5)). So if I'm calculating it for the 2008 Celtics, who scored 8245 pts and allowed 7404, I would plug in: (8245^16.5)/((8245^16.5)+(7404^16.5)) = .855. Multiply .855 by 82, and you get 70 expected wins. 14 is a better exponent than 16.5, though.

3. I just posted a PER excel worksheet to the APBRmetrics files Yahoo group. It's from 2006 (the last year I actually bothered to calculate PER), but you can apply it to any season you want.


Any reason you use 16.5 as the exponent rather than 14?
_________________
http://www.puresabermetrics.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
knicksfan



Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey dudeimstoked,

In following with John Hollinger's most recent book, "Pro Basketball Forecast, 2005-06," he adjusted his Expected Wins formula by raising the power from 14 to 16.5.

I was simply doing it from that perspective. It's become painfully obvious, though, that 16.5 is simply too big a number to work with. Too much reduction involved. Fourteen is basically a more even value that returns closer to round results. It also seems to be a more universally accepted standard.

Another proof of this is when you put the formulas in Excel.

BTW, thanks for the explanation wylie of the division by 5 in Pace. Now that I've conquered that hurdle, now it's on to League VOP.

Thanks guys, for the input. feel free to share more.

Miguel
_________________
LOOK OUT BELOW!!! WITH NO REGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!

Kevin Harlan-TNT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
davis21wylie2121



Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 530
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dudeimstoked wrote:
davis21wylie2121 wrote:
1. "Team Minutes" needs to be divided by 5 to account for the 5 players on the court at any given time.

2. Expected winning % is just found by: (points scored^16.5)/((points scored^16.5)+(points allowed^16.5)). So if I'm calculating it for the 2008 Celtics, who scored 8245 pts and allowed 7404, I would plug in: (8245^16.5)/((8245^16.5)+(7404^16.5)) = .855. Multiply .855 by 82, and you get 70 expected wins. 14 is a better exponent than 16.5, though.

3. I just posted a PER excel worksheet to the APBRmetrics files Yahoo group. It's from 2006 (the last year I actually bothered to calculate PER), but you can apply it to any season you want.


Any reason you use 16.5 as the exponent rather than 14?


When I calculate pyth, I never use anything except 14. For the purposes of his example, though, I kept it at 16.5, since he was already using it and I didn't want to add to the confusion. But for future reference, always use 14.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group