View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
EvanZ
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 307
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:20 am Post subject: Request: Give your home team position designations |
|
|
Now that I'm implementing counterpart defense (and counterpart rebounds and turnovers), it's becoming increasingly important to get the correct matchups. I'm using the matchup files that Aaron B. has created.
I know he's very busy and can't possibly keep track of every NBA team, so I figured it might help both him and myself (and others who want or need these data) to list the position designations for each of our home teams. The idea is that if you take any five players as a unit, you would be able to sort them by their position designation, so they end up facing the correct counterpart.
It's tricky because some players will play SG at times and PG at times. So, for example, you have to think about if two nominal PG's are in the same unit, which one plays point, and which one plays the 2? The one who plays point would be a 1.0, and the other player would be a 1.01. If there was a third "point guard" on the team, he would either be a 0.99 or a 1.02. And so on for every other position.
Here's the "lineup code" I sent Aaron as an example (for the Warriors):
Code: |
Law 1.0
Curry 1.01
Bell 1.5
Ellis 2.0
Williams 2.01
D. Wright 3.0
Carney 3.01
Radmanovic 3.5
B. Wright 4.0
Lee 4.1
Amundson 4.5
Udoh 4.51
Biedrins 4.99
Gadzuric 5.0
|
So, whenever you have time to get around to it, I would appreciate your help in this effort. My hope is that we could keep this thread going throughout the season every year to keep everything current. It's really a form of crowd sourcing, I guess. _________________ http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir |
|
Back to top |
|
|
back2newbelf
Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 276
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I always figured that when I had to do this I'd just sort players by weight, then assign center position to the one with the highest weight and so on. I think it would be a pretty good approximation _________________ http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSMok1
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 Posts: 611 Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's OKC, as best I can figure:
Code: | Player Pos
Eric Maynor 1
Russell Westbrook 1.01
Royal Ivey 1.5
Daequan Cook 1.99
James Harden 2
Thabo Sefolosha 2.5
Morris Peterson 2.99
Kevin Durant 3
Jeff Green 3.5
D.J. White 4
Serge Ibaka 4.5
Nick Collison 4.51
Byron Mullens 4.98
Nenad Krstic 4.99
Cole Aldrich 5
|
OKC has way too many "tweeners". _________________ GodismyJudgeOK.com/DStats
Twitter.com/DSMok1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvanZ
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 307
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
back2newbelf wrote: | I always figured that when I had to do this I'd just sort players by weight, then assign center position to the one with the highest weight and so on. I think it would be a pretty good approximation |
Sure, but where would Magic Johnson be assigned? LeBron? It's difficult when you get down to the lineup level. _________________ http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir |
|
Back to top |
|
|
basketballvalue
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 208
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the help everyone. My list was seed with Crow's input from way back, but it always evolves and I'm always looking for input.
Thanks in advance,
Aaron _________________ www.basketballvalue.com
Follow on Twitter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvanZ
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 307
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, one more thing I should say about this that might be interesting.
We can use the matchup file to count the number of times a player was slotted at each position and find his "true" position. So think of these designations as initial "guesses" which can then be iteratively refined by actual data. I suppose I should volunteer myself to do these calculations. _________________ http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crow
Joined: 20 Jan 2009 Posts: 825
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSMok1
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 Posts: 611 Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EvanZ wrote: | Oh, one more thing I should say about this that might be interesting.
We can use the matchup file to count the number of times a player was slotted at each position and find his "true" position. So think of these designations as initial "guesses" which can then be iteratively refined by actual data. I suppose I should volunteer myself to do these calculations. |
That sounds interesting! _________________ GodismyJudgeOK.com/DStats
Twitter.com/DSMok1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
greyberger
Joined: 27 Sep 2010 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure what to do about the Spurs backcourt - Parker is obviously PG and Manu is SG when Parker's in, but when Parker is resting the guards are Ginobili George Hill and Gary Neal. I suppose Manu is the PG in these lineups but he's 6-6 and as much a finisher as a creator. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvanZ
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 307
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
greyberger wrote: | I'm not sure what to do about the Spurs backcourt - Parker is obviously PG and Manu is SG when Parker's in, but when Parker is resting the guards are Ginobili George Hill and Gary Neal. I suppose Manu is the PG in these lineups but he's 6-6 and as much a finisher as a creator. |
Here's a suggestion. Take a look at the team units at basketball value and see if any of them seem wrong to you:
http://basketballvalue.com/teamunits.php?year=2010-2011&team=SAS
The units are listed in ascending order by position from left to right. _________________ http://www.thecity2.com
http://www.ibb.gatech.edu/evan-zamir |
|
Back to top |
|
|
greyberger
Joined: 27 Sep 2010 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking at it that way, Manu at 2.0x is probably the best compromise. The Spurs:
Code: |
Parker 1.0
Quinn 1.01
Hill 1.5
Neal 2.0
Ginobili 2.01
Owens 2.5
Anderson 3
Jefferson 3.01
Bonner 3.5
Blair 3.99
McDyess 4
Splitter 4.5
Duncan 5
|
I think that's the same as how basketballvalue handles it, except I say Duncan's the five when he's on court with Splitter (he's usually guarding the biggest opponent). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
EvanZ
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 307
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kjb
Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 865 Location: Washington, DC
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wizards guesstimate
Wall 1.0
Shakur 1.01
Hinrich 1.5
Young 2.01
Martin 2.99
Howard 3.0
Thornton 3.1
Lewis 3.2
Booker 3.5
Blatche 4.0
Yi 4.1
Armstrong 4.8
McGee 4.99
Seraphin 5.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogilny
Joined: 05 Aug 2010 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | Will Bynum 1
Tracy McGrady 1.01
Rodney Stuckey 1.5
Ben Gordon 2
Rip Hamilton 2.01
Tayshaun Prince 3
Austin Daye 3.49
DaJuan Summers 3.5
Jonas Jerebko 3.51
Charlie Villanueva 4
Chris Wilcox 4.01
Jason Maxiell 4.5
Ben Wallace 4.99
Greg Monroe 5 |
The Pistons is pretty hard, this is the present rotation. Earlier Stuckey was the starting PG and T-Mac got most of his minutes as a sub for Prince at the 3. JJ has been out for the season so his position is from 09/10.
Terrico White is also on the roster but he broke a leg during the first practice game of the season so he hasn't played a minute in the NBA so far. He is said to be a comboguard.
Edit: This is the positions on offense. On D T-Mac plays the 2 and Stuck/Gordon the 1 when they play together. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deepak
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 665
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is this more for defensive matchup purposes, or the offensive role of the player?
On the Rockets, Adelman likes to use Brooks and Lowry together a lot. Typically, Lowry will guard the opposing 2 because he has a stockier build. But as far as offensive role, Lowry is more of a "true" PG while Brooks plays more of a scoring role. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|