{"id":1087,"date":"2014-08-05T15:24:47","date_gmt":"2014-08-05T20:24:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/godismyjudgeok.com\/DStats\/?p=1087"},"modified":"2014-08-05T15:53:34","modified_gmt":"2014-08-05T20:53:34","slug":"win-shares-hall-rating","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/godismyjudgeok.com\/DStats\/2014\/nba-stats\/win-shares-hall-rating\/","title":{"rendered":"Win Shares Hall Rating"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’ve been playing around with an update to Hall Rating and thought I’d try to turn it into a Top 100 list, since I’ve been following the RealGM Top 100 Project<\/a> debates.<\/p>\n

I’m using Win Shares as my basis here (so I can get all of NBA history), with all of the caveats that implies.<\/p>\n

Methodology:<\/h3>\n

I am only counting seasons where the player was above average (0.10 for WS\/48).\u00a0 The Hall Rating of that season is then calculated using a triangular series weighting (it’s a continuous function).\u00a0 It’s easier to show than describe:
\n0.10 => 0.0
\n0.20 => 0.1
\n0.30 => 0.3
\n0.40 => 0.6<\/p>\n

This is effectively the logical extension of the previous, stepwise weighting function.<\/p>\n

(Nobody’s ever really reached 0.40 WS\/48 anyway.)<\/p>\n

That translated rating is then multiplied by Minutes played and divided by 48 to get Hall Rating, which is therefore on sort of a WS equivalent scale.
\nThe postseason rating was modified a little further.<\/p>\n