APBRmetrics Forum Index APBRmetrics
The statistical revolution will not be televised.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Can PER be applied to single game performances?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ryan.



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:48 pm    Post subject: Can PER be applied to single game performances? Reply with quote

I've yet to see anywhere PER being applied to single game performances. While I understand it's commonly a measure of season totality for a single players effort, I see no reason as to why it couldn't be applied to a single game performance. I don't, however, know how it could be done.

Perhaps multiplying the player's totals in that game by the average amount of games played for league starting fives (or take the easy route and simply multiply by 82) and attribute those numbers to the PER formula?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
davis21wylie2121



Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 359
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For single games, John used to have something called "game score," like the Bill James pitching stat of the same name:

GS = Pts + (0.4*FG) - (0.7*FGA) - (0.4*FTMiss) + (0.7*ORb) + (0.3*DRb) + Stl + (0.7*Ast) + (0.7*Blk) - (0.4*PF) - TO

The scale went like:
50+ is a historic performance.
40-49.9 One of the best games of the season by anyone.
30-39.9 Probably best performance in the NBA that night.
20-29.9 Player of the game.
15-19.9 A very strong effort.
12-14.9 Resonably solid performance.
8-11.9 Average.
5-7.9 Subpar game or did not play many minutes.
0-4.9 Poor game or riding the pine.


Last edited by davis21wylie2121 on Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:53 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ryan.



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. Being relatively new to basketball statistics indepth and not having read any of Hollinger's books yet, I haven't heard of GS. Is it a relatively outdated way of measuring a players single game performance, or still the standard?

I realise this is probably a point not often touched on because single game performances are relatively easy to analyse merely by first-look perception, but I'm working on a little something that would benefit from a particular system. I was looking at how I could incorporate PER to single game performances, if and how that would be relevant and how I could do it.

But if GS is still a standard for this aspect, it will suffice.

Cheers.

The only problem I have with this is that there's no relation to minute production, rather just total production.


Last edited by ryan. on Fri Mar 23, 2007 4:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deepak_e



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 319

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ryan. wrote:

The only problem I have with this is that there's no relation to minute production, rather just total production.


If you're interested on how much a player helped his team win in a given game, why would you adjust for minutes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Analyze This



Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 354
Location: Belgium

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:45 am    Post subject: Re: Can PER be applied to single game performances? Reply with quote

ryan. wrote:
I've yet to see anywhere PER being applied to single game performances. While I understand it's commonly a measure of season totality for a single players effort, I see no reason as to why it couldn't be applied to a single game performance. I don't, however, know how it could be done.

Perhaps multiplying the player's totals in that game by the average amount of games played for league starting fives (or take the easy route and simply multiply by 82) and attribute those numbers to the PER formula?
I use net average from DeanO for single game performances. Buy his book for the details.
_________________
Where There's a WilT There's a Way
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Beattie



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 30
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course there's always the generic efficiency stat such as offered on nba.com where everything gets one unit, in case you haven't seen that:

http://www.nba.com/statistics/efficiency.html#LeagueEfficiencyLeaders .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ryan.



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies, I'll check it them out. I was thinking about generic eff stat beforehand.

"If you're interested on how much a player helped his team win in a given game, why would you adjust for minutes?"

Because I think the rate at which he done so is just as important, and should attribute for something. For example, Player A) Notches 54 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists on 53% FG in 46 minutes. Player B)Notches 54 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists on 54%FG in only 30 minutes.

There's a difference there that the Hollinger formula doesn't take into account.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gabefarkas



Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 879
Location: Durham, NC

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

davis21wylie2121 wrote:
For single games, John used to have something called "game score," like the Bill James pitching stat of the same name:

GS = Pts + (0.4*FG) - (0.7*FGA) - (0.7*FTMiss) + (0.7*ORb) + (0.3*DRb) + Stl + (0.7*Ast) + (0.7*Blk) - (0.4*PF) - TO


I think the single-game formula is pretty neat, and I actually used it here a while ago to break down a game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Mike G



Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 1494
Location: Delphi, Indiana

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deepak_e wrote:
ryan. wrote:

The only problem I have with this is that there's no relation to minute production, rather just total production.


If you're interested on how much a player helped his team win in a given game, why would you adjust for minutes?


Can any 'efficiency rate' formula not include '.../minutes' ?
_________________
40% of all statistics are wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
tHe_pEsTiLeNcE



Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 92
Location: where you aren't

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

davis21wylie2121 wrote:
For single games, John used to have something called "game score," like the Bill James pitching stat of the same name:

GS = Pts + (0.4*FG) - (0.7*FGA) - (0.7*FTMiss) + (0.7*ORb) + (0.3*DRb) + Stl + (0.7*Ast) + (0.7*Blk) - (0.4*PF) - TO

The scale went like:
50+ is a historic performance.
40-49.9 One of the best games of the season by anyone.
30-39.9 Probably best performance in the NBA that night.
20-29.9 Player of the game.
15-19.9 A very strong effort.
12-14.9 Resonably solid performance.
8-11.9 Average.
5-7.9 Subpar game or did not game many minutes.
0-4.9 Poor game or riding the pine.

If I'm looking at that right, it seems that a made field goal loses you points? Or, more accurately, just gives you 1.7 points instead of two?
_________________
I'm so sick I be terminally ill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
deepak_e



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 319

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ryan. wrote:
Thanks for the replies, I'll check it them out. I was thinking about generic eff stat beforehand.

"If you're interested on how much a player helped his team win in a given game, why would you adjust for minutes?"

Because I think the rate at which he done so is just as important, and should attribute for something. For example, Player A) Notches 54 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists on 53% FG in 46 minutes. Player B)Notches 54 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists on 54%FG in only 30 minutes.

There's a difference there that the Hollinger formula doesn't take into account.


There is a difference, I agree. But which player helped his team more? PlayerB's production is more impressive because he did it in fewer minutes, but is he helping his team more than playerA who was able to stay on the court for 16 more minutes? It depends on what the other players on the team are doing, and in particular what their respective substitutes are capable of while they aren't in the game.

Mike G wrote:
deepak_e wrote:
ryan. wrote:

The only problem I have with this is that there's no relation to minute production, rather just total production.


If you're interested on how much a player helped his team win in a given game, why would you adjust for minutes?


Can any 'efficiency rate' formula not include '.../minutes' ?


I think the per minute adjustment makes sense if you want to assess how a player played while on the court, or make projections on how he'd play in the future when his minutes in unknown. But if you just want to know how much a player helped his team win, does it make sense to look at it per minute?

If player1 scores 30 points in 40 minutes and player2 scores 30 points in 20 minutes (same efficiency), did player2 help his team more than player1? It's not totally clear to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
supersub15



Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can somebody explain the difference between FG and FGA in that formula? Is FG = FGM?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ryan.



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^Yeah, it is. Usually if you see FT, FG, 3P it means FTM, FGM, 3PM when concerning individual's statistics. All else will have tm (team) or lg (league) infront of them, or A (attempted) after them.

You probably know all of that already, but just in case...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Beattie



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 30
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is it correct that the game score formula

GS = Pts + (0.4*FG) - (0.7*FGA) - (0.4*FTmiss) + (0.7*ORb) + (0.3*DRb) + Stl + (0.7*Ast) + (0.7*Blk) - (0.4*PF) - TO

is equivalent to

2PM........+1.7 (= +2.0 + 0.4 - 0.7)
3PM........+2.7 (= +3.0 + 0.4 - 0.7)
FTM........+1.0
2Pmiss.....-0.7
3Pmiss.....-0.7
FTmiss.....-0.4
oreb.......+0.7
dreb.......+0.3
ast........+0.7
stl........+1.0
blk........+0.7
to.........-1.0
pf.........-0.4

...as a way of assigning a single exact value to each type of event so as to make the equation easier to visualize, rather than mixing values between points and made shots and attempted shots and misses.

By comparison the nba.com efficiency formula

EFF = ((Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks) - ((Field Goals Att. - Field Goals Made) + (Free Throws Att. - Free Throws Made) + Turnovers))

from that same location

http://www.nba.com/statistics/efficiency.html#LeagueEfficiencyLeaders

comes out equivalent to

2PM........+2.0
3PM........+3.0
FTM........+1.0
2Pmiss.....-1.0
3Pmiss.....-1.0
FTmiss.....-1.0
oreb.......+1.0
dreb.......+1.0
ast........+1.0
stl........+1.0
blk........+1.0
to.........-1.0
pf..........[0]

...is that correct.



Edit: correct FTmiss in the game score formula to be -0.4 instead of -0.7.


Last edited by John Beattie on Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asimpkins



Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it's supposed to be -0.4 for a missed free throw, not -0.7.

(And yes, your reconfiguration looks correct, except for the FTMiss value.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group