Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 884 Location: Durham, NC
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 2:31 pm Post subject:
Personally, I'd say Kidd was playing out of his gourd, while everyone else was performing up to expectations (playoff drop-offs taken into consideration). After Kidd, wouldn't you say that Carter, Jefferson, Bosh, and Ford were the best regular season performers, too? Your T-rates for them are all in the same ballpark, as far as I can tell.
NJ took more 3ptrs than average of Raptors regular season opponents and made a better FG% of them. That seems like the biggest factor in NJ win.
Players and teams get reviewed on 4 factors. Long term coaches and even GMs could as well to identify priorities, trends.
Raptors went from fouling frequently in 05-06 season to one of lowest fouling rates this season. GM let go most of the high rate of fouling players from previous season and both Parker and Garbojosa are low fouling rate. Some returning players reduced fouling rate too.
Personally, I'd say Kidd was playing out of his gourd, while everyone else was performing up to expectations (playoff drop-offs taken into consideration). After Kidd, wouldn't you say that Carter, Jefferson, Bosh, and Ford were the best regular season performers, too? Your T-rates for them are all in the same ballpark, as far as I can tell.
Jefferson's PER was 20 in the series, 15 in the season...that's pretty big.
As an aside: was it my imagination or were there bunches of empty seats visible in the Nets’ arena during the broadcast of game six against the Raptors? How could that be.
If the Nets did 4.8 PPG better than expected, and the Raptors did 4.8 worse, should the spread have swung 9.6 altogether? In fact, Sagarin's ratings would predict Tor to win by an average of 1.2 ppg; but they lost by 6.2 ppg.
The symmetric +/-4.8 is not coincidence. I've figured the average production in this series was 1.064 of the regular season's for the players involved. Thus TJ Ford's mammoth scoring rate is scaled down to a modest improvement. Scaling to the league average of .948 (which is right around the historic average) makes all players in this series look good -- and everyone in the Hou/Uta slugfest appear underachieving. _________________ 40% of all statistics are wrong.
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 884 Location: Durham, NC
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 10:42 pm Post subject:
John Beattie wrote:
As an aside: was it my imagination or were there bunches of empty seats visible in the Nets’ arena during the broadcast of game six against the Raptors? How could that be.
Have you ever tried to get to the Meadowlands? A few years ago when they Nets were in the playoffs (the year they lost to the Lakers) I had bought a package of playoff tickets and ended up selling about half the tickets because of the hassle associated with the commute.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum