View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
schtevie
Joined: 18 Apr 2005 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
The idea of discussing criteria for the HOF as the main event is interesting, very interesting, but as a kind of inaugural/introductory APBR session, it seems to be fraught with the potential for unproductive controversy, especially coincident with a confab of NBA Old Timers, and a complete lack of agreement.
These facts I think shouldn't be terribly controversial:
(1) The statistical record of the bygone era is relatively poor in critical ways (e.g. no series for Offensive Rebounds, Turnovers, and Steals.)
(2) There is no generally-agreed upon state of the art, when it comes to evaluating the evolution (i.e. improvement or worsening) of the game itself - that is the context for evaluating "fame".
(3) Just as there are no firm criteria for choosing a yearly MVP, there are no meaningfully-defined criteria for selecting a HOFer.
(4) And finally, any robust conclusions that might ensue will inevitably and necessarily imply that certain HOFers don't belong. Perhaps even some nice fellow sitting in the audience.
Do these points make sense, and if so, is the hypothetical framework conducive to a successful introduction of the APBR? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HoopStudies
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 527 Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
schtevie wrote: | The idea of discussing criteria for the HOF as the main event is interesting, very interesting, but as a kind of inaugural/introductory APBR session, it seems to be fraught with the potential for unproductive controversy, especially coincident with a confab of NBA Old Timers, and a complete lack of agreement.
These facts I think shouldn't be terribly controversial:
(1) The statistical record of the bygone era is relatively poor in critical ways (e.g. no series for Offensive Rebounds, Turnovers, and Steals.)
(2) There is no generally-agreed upon state of the art, when it comes to evaluating the evolution (i.e. improvement or worsening) of the game itself - that is the context for evaluating "fame".
(3) Just as there are no firm criteria for choosing a yearly MVP, there are no meaningfully-defined criteria for selecting a HOFer.
(4) And finally, any robust conclusions that might ensue will inevitably and necessarily imply that certain HOFers don't belong. Perhaps even some nice fellow sitting in the audience.
Do these points make sense, and if so, is the hypothetical framework conducive to a successful introduction of the APBR? |
Meetings are for solving problems like these. Our goal is not to come out of this and say Players X and Y should or should not be in. It's to deal with conceptual issues as well as issues related to getting data to support those issues... _________________ Dean Oliver
Author, Basketball on Paper
http://www.basketballonpaper.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HeatherA
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul G. and I are at about 50-50. Frankly, it depends upon whether we can find reasonable flights/accommodations. I'm pretty sure we're not going to be able to get anyone to pick up the tab. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 1494 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are hotel suites in Vegas that have basketball courts. Maybe a well-off benefactor will spring for one of these, and we can all just pile in. _________________ 40% of all statistics are wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hollinger
Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd put my odds at about 30-70 -- September is usually the one month a year the Mrs. and I can go someplace like, say, Belgium and frolic for a while. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HoopStudies
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 527 Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hold off on making travel plans to Las Vegas in September. Our primary reason for holding the APBR Meeting there was to have access to some of the NBA Retired Players. They changed their plans and we are now having to reconsider ours.
We will let everyone know as soon as we can what's going to happen where. _________________ Dean Oliver
Author, Basketball on Paper
http://www.basketballonpaper.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NABASPORTS
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 1 Location: Gilbert, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:30 am Post subject: Las Vegas meeting in September 2007 |
|
|
Is there any new information available on the proposed basketball meetings? Please let me know. I have made my interest known and thought this would be a great idea to whomever would be able to attend, and finally attach a face with a name! Thanks. Look forward to seeing everyone. _________________ Norb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike G
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 1494 Location: Delphi, Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's no meeting planned at this time, sorry. _________________ 40% of all statistics are wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HoopStudies
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 527 Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The best opportunity to meet APBR people is probably at the Sloan Sports Conference in Boston in February and at summer leagues. At least that's when I've met my share. Boston is good for East Coast people (there were a lot this year) and the Vegas Summer League is good for West Coast folks. Until we get big enough, tagging along for events like these is what makes sense. _________________ Dean Oliver
Author, Basketball on Paper
http://www.basketballonpaper.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
admin Site Admin
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 677 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pretty small crew in Vegas this year, at least that I was aware of. It was great to meet mikez, however. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|