|
APBRmetrics The statistical revolution will not be televised.
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jeffpotts77
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 150 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: Defensive P.O.Y. |
|
|
Big Ben just won again. Should we start up a poll in here for Defensive player of the year honors? I would start it, but I'm not sure if I might leave someone off. Here's who'd I'd include:
Ben Wallace
Tayshawn Prince
Tim Duncan
Bruce Bowen
Andrei Kirilenko
Jason Kidd
Tyson Chandler
Who else should be included? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eli W
Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 402
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dikembe Mutombo. He doesn't get big minutes, but his impact on the defensive end is still huge. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kjb
Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 864 Location: Washington, DC
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Along with Mutombo -- Jeff Foster, Jason Collins and Brendan Haywood all had MAJOR defensive impact when they were in the game. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FrontRange
Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marcus Camby has been a monster defensively this year - according the 82games he blocked 5.8% of shots attempted when he was in the game (compared to 4.1% of Wallace and 6.8% for AK) and controlled 25.9% of the defensive rebounds which I beleive is the second best rate in the league (trailing only KG). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eli W
Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 402
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Has anyone gone through all of the player pages on 82games and made a ranking of the top on court/off court net defensive numbers? Or a ranking of lowest opponent PER? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ben F.
Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 391
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have them from some time about 3/4 of the way through the season, I think. Capped at -5% and +5%, with a limit of at least 300 min through that point in the season.
So here is the rank (I eliminated some of those that hadn't held up throughout the season, or that benefited from small sample size after changing teams), name, minutes played up through that point in the season, and difference in eFG% defense. I'll update for the end of the season (or Roland can, I guess) if I have time.
Code: | rank fName lName Min diff
1 Alonzo Mourning 457 -5
2 Andrei Kirilenko 928 -4.9
3 Dikembe Mutombo 742 -4.8
4 Brendan Haywood 1390 -4.8
5 Anderson Varejao 412 -4.2
6 Ben Gordon 1225 -4.1
7 Nick Collison 773 -4.1
8 Baron Davis 622 -3.9
9 Adrian Griffin 360 -3.8
10 Lucious Harris 907 -3.8
11 Shandon Anderson 697 -3.7
12 Ryan Bowen 305 -3.7
13 Jason Kapono 943 -3.7
14 Toni Kukoc 510 -3.7
15 Zoran Planinic 303 -3.7
16 Maurice Taylor 923 -3.6
17 Jeff Foster 983 -3.6
18 Marcus Banks 794 -3.5
19 Milt Palacio 1035 -3.4
20 Adonal Foyle 964 -3.4
21 Trevor Ariza 1011 -3.3
22 Chris Andersen 1135 -3.2
23 Bobby Jackson 520 -3.2
24 Tim Duncan 1890 -3.1
25 Zeljko Rebraca 618 -3.1
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kevin Pelton Site Admin
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 978 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My personal pet candidate for Defensive Player of the Year is Kirk Hinrich, who finished about 10th.
The Bulls managed to be a great defensive team without any shot-blocking from their starting five and many steals, which piques my attention. It was all opponent field-goal percentage, which to me reflects on how well they contest shots everywhere on the court.
If you look at them as a team, they totally shut down opposing shooting guards, and that's all Hinrich -- he was pretty much always defending the two.
Watching him against the Sonics, I was even more impressed. Hinrich defended Ray Allen as well or better than anyone all year despite his offensive responsibilities. I don't think Hinrich was the best defender in the league, but I probably would have chipped him a third-place vote. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ben F.
Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 391
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An interesting pick - but how do you justify the Bulls playing 2.7% better eFG defense in his 1166 minutes off the court? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kevin Pelton Site Admin
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 978 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really don't find those numbers particularly meaningful because of noise and lineup combinations.
Another Chicago guard with a terrible defensive rep (Ben Gordon) rates very well by that measure, but if you look at his individual stats (Hinrich's opposing PG numbers, since Gordon defends PGs when they are in the lineup together), they're below average.
If there was an explanation in the way of team defense - as I believe there is in the case of Nick Collison, to give one example - I might be inclined to go with the on-court/off-court numbers, but I don't see that here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tempe85
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't believe that entire list of 25 previously posted did not include Shawn Marion. He's been unbelievable for the Suns this year defensively. A guy only 6-7 has been forced to guard 7-1 guys all season long and he's made it work, without Marion capable of doing this the Suns would have never been able to run with that small lineup and would have never finished close to 62 wins. Maybe his defensive numbers against haven't been the greatest (if you look at how the PF position performed against the Suns) but giving up 6-7 inches to players is monumental. You can quite literally throw out the Stat sheet (which he does have great stats I might add) when you look at Marion's defensive abilities this year.
Of coarse real sports writers voted enough for him to finish 4th so I don't know what I'm complaining about. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roland_Beech
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ah, defense. the big kabana.
there is a lot to it, right?
- one on one shooting defense, eg holding your opponent to a low FG% or low pts per shot
- forcing turnovers
- help defense
- overall influence on team defense
- defensive rebounding (and box outs, etc that secure the rebound for your team even if you don't get it as a player)
- denying your man the ball, the shot, the good position
- "maintaining position" for the team defense, eg being in the right place, fighting through screens, not allowing your man to make an assisted pass
...just to name a few. Many of the effects are clearly complex -- committing a hard foul underneath has likely positive value in deterring future forays into the paint, but also puts your team potentially into the penalty, and yourself into foul trouble
That's not even dabbling in how your offense changes defense. I.e. do you give the same credit for "defense" if one player does next to nothing on offense (hello Bruce Bowen) and the other is using 25% of team possessions?
I'm not sure that people voting for the Defensive Player of the Year award are on the same page when it comes to what should be factored in. Most likely it comes down to:
1) reputation
2) shots blocked
3) steals
4) the team's defense in pts per game allowed and WL success
this is the area along with passing that I think will benefit the most from "extreme charting"
anyway, here are the on/off leaders on defense
-13.2 Collins (NJ)
-10.6 Mutombo
-9.9 Haywood
-9.1 Duncan
-8.8 Foster
-8.3 Kirilenko
-7.7 Allen (Bos)
-7.5 Christie (Sac)
-6.9 Ratliff
-6.4 Cato
-6.4 Drobnjak
-6.4 Ginobili
-6.3 Williams (NY)
-6.1 Anderson (NO)
-6.1 Watson
-6.1 Battier
-5.7 Nesterovic
-5.7 Diaw
-5.6 Prince
[worst: McGrady, Croshere, Harping, J.Rose, JR Smith, Wade, Nocioni, Mason]
..or if you go by pts per 100 allowed while on court
95.3 Mutombo
95.8 Duncan
96.8 Nesterovic
97.1 Ginobili
98.5 Harrington (Chi)
99.4 Bowen (SA)
99.5 Barry (Hou)
99.5 Parker (SA)
99.6 Collins (NJ)
99.9 Horry
100.1 Gordon
100.2 Wallace, Rasheed
100.3 Foster
100.4 Duhon
100.5 Prince
100.6 Davis (Chi)
100.6 Wallace, Ben
100.7 Chandler
[worst: Lue, Childress, Harpring, Atkins, JR Smith]
On vs Off Team Defense eFG allowed
-.052 Mutombo
-.042 Haywood
-.042 Gordon
-.040 Kirilenko
-.040 Kapono (Cha)
-.036 Anderson (NO)
-.033 Ariza
-.033 Duncan
-.033 Diaw
-.032 Collison
-.031 Foster
-.029 Odom
-.029 Billups
-.028 Miles
[worst: McGrady, Croshere, Payton, Wade, Ming]
Team On/Off defensive rebounding
+6.2% Collins (NJ)
+6.1% Brand
+5.0% Foster
+4.4% Nene
+4.4% Bosh
+4.2% Pierce
+4.1% Drobnjak
+4.0% Gooden
+3.9% Dampier
+3.8% Wright (Mem)
+3.7% Battier
+3.6% Barry (SA)
+3.5% Francis
+3.4% Brown (NO)
+3.4% Simmons
+3.3% Ratliff
+3.3% Claxton
+3.2% O'Neal (Mia)
[worst effect: Stoudemire, J.Johnson, Iguodala, Arenas, R.Davis]
...kind of an interesting one. Speedy Claxton! There may be a fair amount of guys-who-push-it deter opponents from going for the OFF'rebounds as much
On/Off FTA attempted per 48minutes by Opponent
-9.0 Collins
-8.8 Ratliff
-8.4 Ilgauskas
-8.2 Prince
-8.1 Haywood
-8.0 Gooden
-7.6 Wright (Mem)
-7.3 Foyle
-7.2 Cato
-7.1 Mihm
-7.0 Blount
-7.0 Evans (Sea)
-6.9 Newble
-6.8 Ginobili
-6.8 Bosh
-6.8 Bowen (SA)
-6.7 Duhon
-6.5 Dampier
-6.3 Duncan
-6.3 Francis
-6.0 Dunleavy
[worst: Delk, R.Davis, Traylor, Ruffin, Gordon, B.Barry, Radmanovic]
..some bias in this for guys who don't play in the "bonus minutes"
anyway, that's probably more numbers than anyone here cared for.
in trying to vote for someone it's hard for me given there are different roles -- how do you compare a perimeter defender to the shot-blocking big man? -- but in general I view it as a battle of Duncan, Haywood, Prince (Mutombo didn't play quite enough minutes for my tastes to deserve the top award) and I'm giving it to Timmy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trapp76_2002
Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What about the Opp PER put up against a player? Wouldn't that be a more accurate measure of defensive ability as opposed to simple +/- ???
The data is here:
http://www.82games.com/peronoff0405.htm
Just wondering if anyone has a list of players with at least 10% min ranked by Opp PER this season. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kjb
Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 864 Location: Washington, DC
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great info, Roland.
trapp76_2002 wrote: | What about the Opp PER put up against a player? Wouldn't that be a more accurate measure of defensive ability as opposed to simple +/- ??? |
No, and the reason why is that counterpart matchup is an extremely approximate measure. I've been tracking indivdiual defense for the Wizards-Bulls series (been doing it for the Wiz since January); and here's one example from game 4. Arenas had 22 possessions where he either attempted a FG, got to the FT line or committed a turnover. 8 different Bulls were involved in at least one of those possessions. Hinrich had the most -- 7. There was tie for 2nd with 3 possessions each for Davis and Griffin. Opp per would likely match Hinrich against Arenas for most of the time the two were on the court, but tracking it more closely reveals the effect of zones, switching and helping.
If we're really going to delve into analyzing available defensive numbers, I think the best place to start is the on/off effects Roland posted, then going into player pair data to begin isolating individual effects. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HoopStudies
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 705 Location: Near Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Roland_Beech wrote: |
I'm not sure that people voting for the Defensive Player of the Year award are on the same page when it comes to what should be factored in. Most likely it comes down to:
1) reputation
2) shots blocked
3) steals
4) the team's defense in pts per game allowed and WL success
|
Reputation is huge. Gary Payton was still being called the best perimeter defender in the league when not a single number would support him being in the top 5 at his position, most wouldn't support him being in the top 15 at his position.
When Tayshaun Prince blocked Reggie Miller's shot in last year's playoffs, he secured himself a spot on the All-Defense Team for 5 years.
Roland_Beech wrote: |
this is the area along with passing that I think will benefit the most from "extreme charting"
|
As we've talked about, knowing what to do with all the new numbers is a whole new set of obstacles. I've been detailing defensive structures that would dictate things to collect, but I'm not happy with it yet. It doesn't give a lot of things to help a coach, which is always my first priority.
Roland_Beech wrote: |
in trying to vote for someone it's hard for me given there are different roles -- how do you compare a perimeter defender to the shot-blocking big man? -- but in general I view it as a battle of Duncan, Haywood, Prince (Mutombo didn't play quite enough minutes for my tastes to deserve the top award) and I'm giving it to Timmy. |
Defense is much harder to untie responsibility. In Basketball on Paper, I also showed that top coaches seem to be associated with all the top defenses in history, whereas it's a mixed bag of coaches associated with offenses. So add coaches into the mix... _________________ Dean Oliver
Author, Basketball on Paper
The postings are my own & don't necess represent positions, strategies or opinions of employers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trapp76_2002
Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | If we're really going to delve into analyzing available defensive numbers, I think the best place to start is the on/off effects Roland posted, then going into player pair data to begin isolating individual effects. |
It seems like any +/- stat is only going to tell part of the story then. What I'm basically reading here is that the real crux of tracking defense comes down to accurately assigning responsibility to an individual player on that end of the floor, which can only be done by meticulous charting (of which its difficult to find volunteers for). Even then, there are gray areas as far as who to assign responsibility to in a zone defense, etc.
Its a very interesting topic to me personally, (I know its a tough task to measure in baseball as well). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|