View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kevin Pelton Site Admin
Joined: 30 Dec 2004 Posts: 978 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:44 am Post subject: Eli W Interview |
|
|
http://mvn.com/mlb-stats/2008/06/04/basketball-sabermetrics/
As the interview is with a baseball site, I found this question interesting.
Quote: | How much crossover do you think there is between the APBRmetric readers and the SABRmetric readers and researchers?
I don’t think there’s that much, actually. I think people tend to stick to their own sport. For me personally I’m a baseball fan and a fan of statistics (obviously), but I’ve always preferred to watch and follow baseball without getting into the sabermetric stuff. I do read a number of sabermetric sites and books now, but that’s mainly to get ideas that I think could transfer over to analyzing basketball. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ryan J. Parker
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 708 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I personally try to read as much as I can find from baseball and football.
Good interview, BTW. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Neil Paine
Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 774 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I'm actually pretty heavily involved in stat analysis for all 4 major sports (basketball, baseball, football, & hockey), not just hoops. After I read Moneyball for the first time when I was a junior in high school, there was just no going back... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mtamada
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 376
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps an even more interesting crossover is one into a realm which is entirely different, yet which has many of the same features as sports: politics. If you read much sabrmetrics, then you've probably read some of Nate Silver's stuff -- he's one of the authors at BaseballProspectus.com. As a sideline, he's got a website where he studies political stats.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/05/no-im-not-chuck-todd.html
Since long before the Oakland A's dreamed of hiring Billy Beane, political parties have been hiring statistical consultants to study political precincts, pollster data, voter demographics, etc. If you like this kind of stuff, there's undoubtedly a lot more (and potentially better paying) jobs in the political world than in the sports world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mtamada
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 376
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More on Nate Silver, the sabrmetrician attracting notice as a political stats pundit, in Newsweek.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/140469 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mountain
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be a only a rough guide but perhaps you could treat lineups played against as "precincts" in a manner similar to what Nate Silver did for the Presidential primary and predict a specific lineup's (the candidate) performance against future precincts based on the similarities and differences between profiles. With the methodology down, the right set of variables and the time and incentive. Instead of just looking at raw or adjusted overall lineup +/-.
In addition to war gaming at the tactical level you could try to look at the bigger strategic picture. It would be hard to predict how lineup vs lineup would go exactly in an entire game as coaches may react in unique ways but you probably could understand current rotation patterns and match-up tendencies and crank out data that might aid thinking about strategic adjustment patterns.
Some people may already be doing something in this vein. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|