This is Google's cache of http://www.sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/viewtopic.php?p=11883&sid=573bd5037750fffbbb7369772027d65a. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Mar 30, 2011 01:27:59 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: ed küpfer  
APBRmetrics :: View topic - Scoring Possessions
APBRmetrics Forum Index APBRmetrics
The statistical revolution will not be televised.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Scoring Possessions

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Getch



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:46 am    Post subject: Scoring Possessions Reply with quote

In Dean Oliver's book, he gives the following formula as an estimate of team scoring possessions:

Team Scoring Possessions = Field Goals Made + (1-(1-FT%)^2) x FTA x 0.4

Can some one please explain to me how this formula was derived, as well as what each component means? (i.e. why is (1-(1-FT%)^2) or 0.4 included in this formula)

Finally, why do people calculate scoring possessions? What does it tell you? Does scoring possession alone (as opposed to its use in the Field% formula) have any utility?

Thanks for the help!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
milt



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 3
Location: London, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(1-(1-FT%)^2) looks like the probability that a trip to the line results in at least one point, assuming there were two free throw attempts.

0.4 is the number of possessions per free throw attempt. It's not exactly 0.5 (i.e. 2 FTAs = 1 possession) because it accounts for and-1 free throws, as well as fouls on 3-point attempts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Küpfer



Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 785
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because under this scenario possessions have a binary score/no score result, Floor% follows a binomial distribution, making variance and confidence interval calculations much easier. Multinomial variance, for things like EFG% or TS%, is freaking complicated (I outlined the method somewhere on this site) -- it's much easier to go with FL% * (1 - FL%) / POSS.
_________________
ed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group