This is Google's cache of viewtopic.php?p=10199&sid=027b0690c8b44aa10219b081a43436c3. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Mar 22, 2011 00:09:43 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: cherokee_acb  
APBRmetrics :: View topic - Defensive pace
APBRmetrics Forum Index APBRmetrics
The statistical revolution will not be televised.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Defensive pace

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cherokee_ACB



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:39 am    Post subject: Defensive pace Reply with quote

I've combined 82games time of possession data
http://www.82games.com/random27.htm
with KnickerBlogger.net team defensive stats
http://www.knickerblogger.net/stats/2006/d_de.htm
to estimate the average time spent per defended possession. I did the same for offense, but the results were not much interesting due to being highly correlated with overall pace.

The numbers I get, expressed as equivalent pace (possessions per minute if both offense and defense were played at the defensive pace), are:

Code:

     Team        DPace    OPace    ORk   
 Utah            1.94     1.72      29   
 Philadelphia    1.92     1.93      9   
 Cleveland       1.91     1.81      22   
 Toronto         1.91     1.88      16   
 Charlotte       1.90     1.98      4   
 Sacramento      1.90     1.91      11   
 New York        1.89     1.88      15   
 New Orleans/Ok  1.89     1.79      24   
 Golden State    1.88     1.98      5   
 Phoenix         1.88     2.11      1   
 Atlanta         1.88     1.87      17   
 Milwaukee       1.88     1.89      13   
 Miami           1.88     1.89      14   
 L.A. Lakers     1.88     1.90      12   
 Washington      1.88     1.95      8   
 Denver          1.87     2.05      2   
 L.A. Clippers   1.87     1.92      10   
 Memphis         1.87     1.71      30   
 San Antonio     1.87     1.78      26   
 Orlando         1.87     1.80      23   
 Detroit         1.87     1.73      28   
 Dallas          1.86     1.79      25   
 Boston          1.86     1.97      6   
 Indiana         1.86     1.83      21   
 New Jersey      1.85     1.85      18   
 Seattle         1.85     1.96      7   
 Chicago         1.85     2.03      3   
 Portland        1.85     1.77      27   
 Minnesota       1.85     1.84      19   
 Houston         1.81     1.83      20   


Two extreme cases are Utah and Houston. Utah's high defensive pace can be explained by their high offensive TO rate, their NBA leading OR% and their high FT/FG ratio at both ends of the court. It's harder to explain, just by looking at the available stats, why Houston manages to slow down the opponents so much, since they don't stand out in any of the 4 factors, defense or offense. It could just be Yao presence in the zone, or JVG system.

I haven't done much analysis yet (I'm either busy or lazy for that), but on quick visual inspection it seems that, among the 4 factors, allowed eFG% is the one that correlates the most with defensive pace. I see no correlation at all between offensive pace and defensive pace, i.e. a high (or low) tempo of yours is not likely to disrupt the offensive pace of your opponent.


Last edited by cherokee_ACB on Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deepak



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 664

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:

Defensive Pace Correlation
        Offense Defense
Poss    0.145   0.078
Eff     0.039   0.342
eFG     -0.223  0.474
TO      0.016   0.334
REB%    0.343   0.099
FT/FG   0.358   0.180


From this, it's not too surprising that Houston had the slowest "defensive pace." Highest correlation with eFG and TO on defense ... Houston forced opponents to shoot a low eFG% from the field, and also did not force many turnovers.

On offense, offensive rebounding and free throw rate correlates the most with defensive pace. Rockets were in the bottom ten in both categories (of course, they were bottom ten for all the four factors on offense). It appears that defensive pace correlates negatively with eFG (so, bad shooting teams tend to allow faster defensive possessions). Houston did not fit this particular pattern.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cherokee_ACB



Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've changed the stats in the post above. Previously I had assumed offensive and defensive possessions at KB.net were the same, and took the offense data. I've fixed that. I've also added the pace at offense, computed the same way. The last column is the rank for this offensive pace. Utah is still on top, Houston difference is now a bit higher.

Deepak, since I deduce these paces from the possession stats, I don't think you should correlate with them. Obviously, the faster the opponent attacks, the more possessions there are in a game for both teams.

I said before that Utah's high FT/FG partly explained the fast opponent tempo. I meant the opposite. After all, shooting FTs prevents fastbreaks and quick transition attacks. The correlation between FT/FG on offense and defensive pace is counterintuitive to me. I see this is partly due to the correlation between FT/FG and OR% (which I can't easily explain either), but it still leaves me scratching my head.

I find surprising as well the small but positive correlation between opponent OR% and defensive pace. Shouldn't OffRbs lengthen possessions? At least when looking at offense the expected negative correlation exists.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deepak



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 664

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cherokee_ACB wrote:

Deepak, since I deduce these paces from the possession stats, I don't think you should correlate with them. Obviously, the faster the opponent attacks, the more possessions there are in a game for both teams.


Right, I figured that didn't mean anything.

Quote:
I said before that Utah's high FT/FG partly explained the fast opponent tempo. I meant the opposite. After all, shooting FTs prevents fastbreaks and quick transition attacks. The correlation between FT/FG on offense and defensive pace is counterintuitive to me. I see this is partly due to the correlation between FT/FG and OR% (which I can't easily explain either), but it still leaves me scratching my head.


I also think FT/FG correlation is tied to OR%. OR% correlates positively with "defensive pace" because strong offensive rebounding teams typically wouldn't get back on defense as well ... which leads to more quick buckets for the opponent. JVG's philosophy in Houston is to sacrifice offensive rebounding for good transition defense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ben F.



Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 391

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but how is UTA on top of the time per defensive possession when in the 82games article you linked to they have the most time with the ball on the offensive end?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deepak



Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 664

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFSBasketball wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but how is UTA on top of the time per defensive possession when in the 82games article you linked to they have the most time with the ball on the offensive end?


That's not time per defensive possessions. It's the inverse ... possessions per minute.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark



Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 807

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is some good reasoning here that provides a better starting point for the who dictates pace or what pace to expect from a matchup question raised several times in other threads. The 4 factors provides clues but there is still choice and noise and pace is two parts.

Inducing teams to play a speed or pace-side they isnt as good for them and makes it easier to play one good for you remains an important field for more studies.

Point guard pace preference and level of coach control over point guard may be a very interesting part of it. Point guards and coaches dont allows agree on pace and pace good for a PG isnt always the best for the team and some seem to put team interests first and some will slip into personal preference if the opponent seems to give them the opportunity or do it on their own.

If really wanted to play a certain pace, I'd either bait a PG to run and gun early in game (give him half a lane to tempt his commitment but of course still try to stop; or run a lot of plays against him in particular to try to make him hot for payback) or really try to slow him down with help and ball denial, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    APBRmetrics Forum Index -> General discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group